
The right to disconnect
Does flexible working need more rules?
SW – 08/2020
Flexible working in terms of time and
location holds advantages for many, such as greater autonomy at work and a
better work-life balance. During the coronavirus crisis, telework has enabled
many areas of business to continue to operate and employ staff. However,
flexible working also involves a number of risks, such as removing the
boundaries between personal and professional life and being contactable at all
times. It also presents employees and managers with new challenges. The already
familiar topic of a "right to disconnect" is also the subject of renewed
attention.
Whether or not additional legal provisions
are needed for the right to disconnect is currently under discussion by the
European Parliament Committee on Employment and Social Affairs. In its draft
report with recommendations to the Commission presented on 27 July 2020
(2019/2181/INL), the Committee calls for a directive to ensure that workers can
exercise their right to disconnect (text currently only available in English).
The right of workers to health and safety at work is the key to a right to
disconnect in order to protect the physical and mental health and well-being of
workers.
The new directive must provide solutions to
take account of employers' responsibilities and workers' expectations regarding
the organisation of their working hours when using digital work equipment. It
should supplement Directive 2003/88/EC concerning certain aspects of the
organisation of working time, Directive (EU) 2019/1152 on transparent and
predictable working conditions in the European Union and Directive (EU)
2019/1158 on work-life balance for parents and carers.
Background
The European Parliamentary Research Service
has also looked at the impact of the increase in teleworking in its "The
right to disconnect” report (text currently only available in English). One
risk is the possible increase in workload if the right of teleworkers to
disconnect is not expressly regulated and complied with fully. Also of concern
is the fact that the monitoring of employees' mobile devices could enable
employers to obtain GPS tracking information that would allow them to determine
the location, daily routines, private information and health conditions of
employees.
Indeed some EU Member States have recently
taken positive steps in relation to telework to regulate the work-related use
of digital communications and to protect workers. However, there is currently
no EU legislation that specifically addresses the extent or timing of
work-related electronic communications between employers and employees.
The Working Time Directive deals indirectly
with the right to disconnect by defining working time, maximum working time and
minimum daily and weekly rest periods. Articles 153 and 154 of the Treaty on
the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which allow the EU to adopt
directives laying down minimum requirements for working conditions and to
support and supplement the activities of the Member States in this field, could
also be used as a legal basis for rules dealing directly with the right to
disconnect.
Nonetheless, the authors themselves point
out the difficulties of reaching political agreement on amendments to the
Working Time Directive. As a pragmatic approach, they propose a directive
containing enforcement provisions for the Directive on Health and Safety at
Work. Based on recent developments and the case law of the European Court of
Justice, such an enforcement directive could include clarifications on the measurement
of working time, daily and weekly rest periods and the role of agreements
between management and labour.