
Establishing and Completing the European Health Data Space (EHDS)
EHDS has been approved by the Council.
CC – 01/2025
The legislative process for establishing a
new regulation in the EU takes an average of one and a half to three years. The
EHDS (European Health Data Space) is therefore at the upper end of this time
frame. The Economic and Financial Affairs Council adopted the regulation on 21 January after two years and eight months.
Following its adoption by the European
Parliament in December last year, this represents the - almost - final step on
the long road to this legislative act, which was presented by the European Commission
on 3 May 2022. The ordinance will now be formally signed by the Council and the
European Parliament. Following its publication in the EU's Official Journal,
the EHDS will come into force 20 days later, thereby initiating the
transitional periods for full implementation.
The beginning
In its 2020 data strategy, the European
Commission planned to create ten common data spaces, including agriculture,
energy and - as a first step - health.
On 3 May 2022, the European Commission
presented its proposal for a regulation about the EHDS. It intended to make
electronic treatment data and prescriptions available to insured people through
their electronic patient files that would be accessible across borders (primary
use). The EHDS is intended to help improve cross-border healthcare and make
things significantly easier for mobile insured people within the EU. It also
creates the basis for making the health data available in the member states
usable for research, further developing care and optimising the healthcare
systems (secondary use).
The development
One central question arose after the regulation’s
text was presented: that of responsibilities. The European Parliament had to
clarify which committee was responsible for what. It was agreed that
responsibility would be shared between the Committee for Civil Liberties,
Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) and the Committee for the Environment, Public
Health and Food Safety (ENVI).
It was clear to the Council that the Health
Council (EPSCO) was responsible. However, there were concerns as to whether the
Commission should intervene so deeply in the competences and healthcare systems
of the member states. The ordinance is based on Article 114 Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which regulates the internal market
whilst maintaining a high level of health protection. The competence to
organise their healthcare systems remains with the member states under Article
168 TFEU.
The member states were initially able to
define their position in the Council and they advocated strengthening their
co-determination rights, particularly with regard to governance and defining
the technical specifications. Patients’ rights to co-determination have also
been clarified when compared to the European Commission’ proposal. It should be
left up to the member states to define the opt-out regulations, i.e. the right
to object to the use and sharing of health data. Another change concerned the
exchange format to be used for the electronic health record (EHR), in which the
Council wishes to distinguish between a national and a cross-border profile.
The European Parliament adopted its
position in plenary a week later. The MEPs focussed on cross-border data
exchanging from the outset. The focus was on patients' co-determination rights
as well as data protection and data security. The question of which health data
may be recorded, used and shared was treated with particular sensitivity. An
amendment adopted at short notice during the plenary session led to
discussions: It clarified that member states may grant natural persons a
comprehensive right to object ("opt-out") not only to the use but
also to the recording of their personal data in an EHR.
No time was to be lost at the end of the
mandate in order to be able to adopt the dossier on time. After three months
and 27 technical meetings, an agreement was reached between the Council and
Parliament in the trialogue held back in March 2024. The opt-out regulations,
EHR systems and implementing the deadlines were particularly controversial
discussion issues.
Although the European Parliament and the
Committee of Permanent Representatives (Coreper) approved the political
agreement in April 2024, the legal and linguistic verification could not be
finalised before the European elections in May 2024. This delayed the
legislative process. However, things moved quickly once the review had been
completed: Parliament adopted the regulation on 17 December 2024 and the
Council approved it one month later, on 21 January 2025. EHDS is coming.
The perspective
The regulation will be implemented in
stages: Depending on the regulation’s subject matter, it will come into effect
after two to six years. The first data exchanges are scheduled to occur either
at the end of 2028 or the beginning of 2029. In the meantime, numerous details
will be regulated in implementing acts. Most of these are likely to have been
adopted by the end of 2026 or early 2027.
Here in Germany nothing has been put to bed
with the adoption of the ordinance text - things are really getting going now.
It is necessary to examine which additions need to be made to the Digital Act
or the Health Data Utilisation Act to ensure that the EHDS can be implemented
smoothly at national level. It will also be necessary to clarify which
adjustments need to be made to the German Social Code and if any structures
need to be established.
DSV has repeatedly emphasised in statements just how important it is to strengthen the
co-determination rights of the member states. Health data should be used to
serve the common good and primarily benefit patients as well as the social and
healthcare systems. Projects that demonstrably create added value for them
should therefore be eligible for use. DSV will closely follow the EHDS
implementation with this in mind.