Centralised development and maintenance of
the RINA (Reference Implementation for a National Application) software by the European Commission (EC) should be completed by the middle of the year. However, it is important that
this major European project facilitates electronic communications between the
social insurance funds in Europe.
Cross-border electronic exchanging of
social security data in Europe should enable national institutions to process
claims from migratory citizens for social benefits and the reimbursement of
healthcare costs more quickly and efficiently. This is why an IT system is
currently being introduced with EESSI to facilitate quick and secure exchanging
of information by the social security institutions.
EESSI and RINA must be thought of together
In many cases, RINA will be used to support
the implementation process from a central location and to get EESSI “up and
running". With RINA, the relevant social security authorities in the
countries within the European Economic Area as well as the UK and Switzerland
have been given a tool by the EC to gradually establish electronic
communications with each other.
Even very small authorities still need RINA
Whereas EESSI describes the framework,
procedures and communications sequences, RINA is the "electronic writing
tool". More precisely: it is one of many possible writing tools. With
RINA, the Commission has made an electronic offer for practical implementation
of the online application on a transitional basis. Member states will have to
develop and finance their own software solutions on a permanent basis. The
larger social security authorities have already done this. This is because RINA
was designed for handling a small number of cases and it is only suitable to a
limited extent for large institutions with a high communication densities.
Institutions with a low number of cases did not consider it worth investing in
their own software solutions. They bet on RINA.
The first exchange of a structured
electronic message occurred in January 2019. This was preceded by years of
preparatory work. The EC’s overly-ambitious timetable for EESSI inevitably led
to delays due to a large number of unresolved procedural issues. All in all,
they have still come a long way: social security institutions are working on
getting digital processes up and running reliably throughout Europe. The end is
now in sight for the introduction of EESSI in many countries.
Successful conclusion at risk
However, the EC now wishes to hand over the
further development and maintenance of RINA in the midst of the ongoing
development and implementation of EESSI. Individual member states or RINA users
will now have to take over the financing and development themselves in the
short term and in addition to the introduction of EESSI. This is highly problematic
because RINA users have not yet been able to set up structures to jointly
continue electronic communications via RINA by themselves and without the
Commission. If the EC does end its own work on RINA by mid-2021 as intended,
then EESSI is in danger of running into a wall. Many social security
institutions would then simply lose the "writing tool" needed to
participate in EESSI. This has also been made clear to the EC by the Platform
of European Social Insurance Institutions in Europe (ESIP
statement of 26/11/2020).
The EC's position is hardly comprehensible.
The fact is that the process of setting up EESSI will still need more time; at
least until the end of 2021 for Germany. As things are, no one can currently
say when the last relevant body in the last of the 32 participating countries
will be able to put the final EESSI communications channel into operation. With
that said, it is incomprehensible that the EC still wants to stick to the July
2021 deadline and transfer the operating, maintaining and financing of RINA.
Especially as it has failed to analyse the anticipated specific consequences
for the communicating and interacting in the entire cross-national exchanging
of European social security data.
The Commission is showing little flexibility
The time factor is a sensitive point in the
transition, which was acknowledged also by the EC in mid-December. However, at
best, a postponement of the transition date, originally scheduled for the end
of July, should be possible by a few months. This won't do especially as there
is no viable concept for the transition. The EC will have to provide additional