
Revising pharmaceutical legislation
High prices are preventing access to medicines
UM – 11/2022
The contest for the best reform proposals
reached the European Parliament during the run-up to revising the
pharmaceutical legislation.
Countering excessive prices
Back in October, a letter from the Chair of
the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE) Cristian Silviu Busoi
(Christian Democrats/EPP) and other committee members, mainly from the EPP and
RENEW/Liberal parties, was circulating in political Brussels. Together they
expressed particular concerned about ideas to increase the transparency relating
to R&D spending by pharmaceutical manufacturers and making clinical trial
data more widely available. Both are central demands of the funding bodies as
well as German Social Security. This information is needed in order to arrive
at realistic estimates and appropriate prices during reimbursement negotiations
and benefit assessments. All of the health systems and the insured must
ultimately be protected from excessive drug prices in order to remain
functional.
Ensuring that medicines can be supplied in all countries
The European Consumers' Organisation also
became involved in the discussion at the beginning of November and they have
also addressed the European Parliament. In its letter
of 2 November 2022 the European Consumers' Organisation stressed the
importance of R&D reaching everyday healthcare. High drug prices, often for
cancer therapies, would prevent this. Furthermore, not all of the new medicines
would be available in all of the EU’s member states for commercial reasons. This
would create inequalities.
Voluntary agreements made by the industry are not enough
The European Consumers' Organisation have
said that the existing incentive system must be revised in a balanced way to be
part of the new pharmaceutical legislation. In addition to affordable prices,
availability of generics and biosimilars must be ensured and it must
also be ensured that the new medicines are available in all of the member
states. Voluntary agreements by the industry would not be enough.
No to pharmaceutical vouchers
The consumer association is also clearly
against the so-called TEE (Transferable Exclusivity Extension) vouchers, which
the European Commission still wants to use to promote the development of new antimicrobial
drugs. According to the European Consumers' Organisation, the idea that after
market exclusivity has been established, the rights can then be transferred to
other pharmaceutical products or sold to third parties obstructs generic
competition and leads to enormous costs in health systems, e.g. when such
rights are transferred to blockbusters from pharmaceutical companies without
any further restrictions. Even one year of additional exclusivity protection
will lead
to higher expenses for health insurers, which could have been avoided if
generic competition had started earlier (please see your news from August 2022).
The European Commission proposal to revise pharmaceutical
legislation was originally expected in the fourth quarter of this year, but
will now be delayed until 2023.