New European Commission
Ursula von der Leyen presents Commission College.
HS – 09/2024
On 17
September, Ursula von der Leyen presented her designated College of 26 Commissioners. The new Commission has
one hierarchical level less than that of the previous legislative period, in
which there were both Executive and Non-Executive Vice-Presidents in addition
to Commissioners. The designated College includes 14 Commissioners from the
European People's Party, five Liberals, four from the Social Democrats and one
from the right-wing Conservatives.
Slimmer structure
The new
structure with flatter hierarchies is supposed to lead to more dialogue and
cooperation with one another. This is also evident from the portfolios and Mission
Letters of the Commissioners-designate. These hardly provide for exclusive
responsibilities for one department or topic. Instead, many responsibilities,
especially important ones, are divided up among various Commission members. In
contrast to the last five years, this makes it unlikely that a single member of
the College will be able to amass above-average power. At the same time, this
means more power and control for von der Leyen, who as President pulls the
strings and has the final say in the event of disagreements between the
Commission members.
Thematic focuses
When
presenting the College, Ursula von der Leyen named six priorities that are
reflected in the titles of the six Executive Vice-Presidents: "Clean, Just
and Competitive Transition", "Tech Sovereignty, Security and
Democracy", "Prosperity and Industrial Strategy", "People,
Skills and Preparedness" and "Cohesion and Reforms"; the High
Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
also assumes the role of Executive Vice-President. There are four women and two
men among the six Vice-Presidents – a reversal of the overall 40 percent women
and 60 percent men in the College.
Social Affairs with a Vice-President
The
"People, Skills and Preparedness" portfolio is to include social
rights, employment, education and learning, among other things, and is
allocated to Roxana Mînzatu from Romania. It remains to be seen whether the
Members of the European Parliament will exert pressure during their hearing so
that the title is changed in order to include "Social Affairs" – as
was customary in the past. According to her Mission Letter Mînzatu is to draw up a new action plan for
the further implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights. Two
Directorates-General are to report to her – the Directorate-General for
Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion (EMPL) and the Directorate-General for
Education, Youth, Sport and Culture (EAC). Glenn Micallef, the
Commissioner-designate for "Intergenerational Fairness, Youth, Culture and
Sport", will exclusively report to her.
Health with Hungary
Olivér
Várhelyi, Commissioner-designate for "Health and Animal Welfare",
also reports to Mînzatu on health preparedness. Apart from this, he reports to
Vice-President Teresa Ribera (Clean, Just and Competitive Transition) and,
under the leadership of Vice-President Henna Virkkunen (Tech Sovereignty,
Security and Democracy), is to draw up an action plan for the cyber security of
hospitals and healthcare providers within the first 100 days. In addition, his Mission Letter also envisages driving forward the European
Health Union, making healthcare systems more resilient and adopting a law on
critical medicines.
Next steps
The
Commissioners-designate are first scrutinised by the European Parliament's
Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI) for potential conflicts of interest. This is
followed by the hearing process by the responsible committees. To this end, the
Commissioners must first answer written questions, after which the hearings are
expected to begin on 4 November. In the subsequent votes, one representative of
each political group cast their vote (weighted according to the size of the
political group in the committee); a two-thirds majority is required for
confirmation. If this is not achieved, the candidate must answer additional
written questions or return for another hearing before the vote is taken again.