iStockphoto/Reptile8488Parliament Draft Report on the Biotech Act
SPC extension retained – further strengthening of the industrial policy approach
CC – 06/2026
On 15 June,
rapporteurs Vytenis Andriukaitis (S&D, SANT) and Wouter Beke (EPP, ITRE)
presented their joint
draft report on the European Biotech Act. In the explanatory statement, the
rapporteurs argue that Europe is losing ground to the United States and China
in global competition and must do more to translate its scientific excellence
into innovation, manufacturing and economic value creation. In their view, the
Biotech Act should therefore go beyond a narrowly defined sectoral instrument
and establish a "European biotechnology ecosystem" that combines
competitiveness, strategic autonomy and tangible benefits for patients.
Overall,
the draft report closely follows the Commission
proposal presented in December but introduces additional industrial policy
instruments, regulatory incentives and further measures to accelerate
regulatory procedures.
Expansion of strategic projects and new industrial policy instruments
A central
element of the draft report is the further development of the strategic
projects already proposed by the European Commission. These projects are
intended to support particularly important biotechnology medicines and
technologies that are considered strategically relevant for innovation,
manufacturing and security of supply. They would benefit from accelerated
authorisation procedures as well as facilitated access to public support and
financing.
The
rapporteurs propose additional categories for projects of particular strategic
importance and the creation of "EU Biotech Flagship Zones" to promote
European biotechnology hubs across the entire value chain. They also introduce
an "Advanced Biomanufacturing Technology (ABT) Designation" as a new
regulatory incentive for innovative manufacturing technologies. At the same
time, authorisation procedures for projects of exceptional strategic importance
would be further accelerated: for so-called "High-Impact Projects",
the maximum authorisation period would be reduced to four months instead of the
ten months proposed by the Commission.
Further acceleration of clinical trials
While the
European Commission had already proposed shorter timelines for clinical trials,
the rapporteurs go a step further by proposing additional deadline reductions
and new dedicated procedures for multinational clinical trials. They propose
amending the Clinical Trials Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 536/2014) by
introducing a specific procedure for multinational clinical trials. The aim is
to further centralise and harmonise procedures while reducing approval
timelines. In addition, dedicated fast-track procedures are proposed for rare
diseases, rare cancers, advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), critical
medicines and cross-border health threats. The rapporteurs also call for closer
integration of the European Reference Networks (ERNs), registries, biobanks and
research infrastructures.
SPC extension remains unchanged
The
rapporteurs do not propose any changes to the European Commission's proposal
for a one-off twelve-month extension of the Supplementary Protection
Certificate (SPC). As a result, one of the most controversial elements of the
Biotech Act remains unchanged in the draft report. While the opinion-giving ENVI and JURI Committees recommended deleting the provision entirely, the lead committees
SANT and ITRE maintain the principle of granting additional exclusivity rights.
In its statement,
the German Social Insurance European Representation (DSV) strongly opposes the
proposed SPC extension. According to DSV calculations, the measure could
generate additional annual costs of around €585 million for Germany's statutory
health insurance system and approximately €1.7 billion per year across the
European Union. During the EPSCO Council meeting on 16 June, Poland, Estonia
and Malta likewise warned of negative effects on competition, delayed
biosimilar market entry, higher healthcare expenditure and reduced
affordability of medicines.
A stronger industrial and innovation policy approach
Overall,
the rapporteurs pursue a clearly industry- and innovation-oriented approach. In
addition to maintaining the SPC extension, they propose new support
instruments, privileged project categories and further accelerated procedures.
At the same time, they seek to strengthen links between European research, data
and healthcare infrastructures, particularly in the field of rare diseases. The
draft report therefore reinforces the broader trend of increasingly linking
health policy objectives with industrial and competitiveness objectives.
Outlook
Amendments
to the draft report may be tabled in the lead ITRE and SANT Committees until 7
July. The committee vote is currently scheduled for 1 December. The opinions
already adopted by the associated committees will also feed into the
negotiations. The European Parliament is expected to adopt its position in
plenary in early 2027. The Council likewise aims to reach its General Approach
around the same time.