Getty Images - Christian ChanSupplementary pension provision as risk capital
The IORP II revision puts the future of pension provision in the spotlight.
VS – 06/2026
On
22 and 23 June, Members of the European Parliament exchanged views on the proposed
directive to strengthen the framework for occupational pensions (IORP II
revision). Through the proposed revision, the European Commission aims to
further develop the European framework for occupational pensions. The proposal
forms part of a broader package of measures to strengthen supplementary pension
provision, presented by the Commission in November 2025 as part of the Savings and Investments Union. From the Commission's perspective, occupational and
personal pensions should in future not only contribute to providing adequate
retirement income but also play a stronger role as a source of long-term
capital for investment.
Discussions in the European Parliament
The
European Commission’s plans have already met with criticism in the European
Parliament. The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) is the lead
committee responsible for the IORP II revision; the Committee on Employment and
Social Affairs (EMPL) is contributing an opinion. During a debate on the draft
reports, MEPs from several political groups warned against encroaching on
national competences and disrupting tried-and-tested occupational pension
schemes. Representatives from the EPP, S&D, ECR and PfE also expressed
concerns about a greater focus on directing pension assets towards industrial
or economic policy objectives.
The role of supplementary pension provision
According
to the Commission, occupational and personal pensions should in future serve as
a key source of risk capital. To encourage wider participation, the Commission
proposes, among other measures, automatic enrolment with an opt-out option,
pension tracking services and a pension dashboard. It also seeks to remove
potential barriers to investment in equities and venture capital. At the same
time, the European framework for institutions for occupational retirement
provision is to be modernised and strengthened.
Implications for pension provision in Germany
The
proposed reforms would particularly affect Germany's collectively organised
occupational pension system. The plans envisage greater harmonisation of
products and governance structures, as well as rules that have so far been
designed primarily with private financial products in mind. This could result
in higher costs and additional capital requirements, with potential
implications for well-established national pension arrangements.
With
regard to the first pillar, the Commission emphasises that supplementary
pension provision is intended to complement, rather than replace, the statutory
pension scheme. Nevertheless, the greater mobilisation of private savings could
reignite the debate on the relationship between statutory, occupational and
private pension provision.
What happens next?
Members
of the ECON Committee have until 16 July to table amendments to the draft
report. On Friday, 26 June, the Permanent Representatives of the Member States
to the European Union (Coreper) approved the EU Council’s general
approach to the revision of the IORP II revision. This is likely to further
heighten the debate on the role of occupational pension schemes within the
framework of the Savings and Investments Union.