
Sustainability Reporting
European Commission adopts revised reporting standards.
SK – 07/2026
At the beginning of July – just two months
after publishing the draft – the European Commission adopted the final version
of the revised European Sustainability
Reporting Standards (ESRS). The standards set reporting parameters in the areas of environmental,
social and governance. Occupational safety and health is a key component of the
social standard ‘ESRS S1 – Own Workforce’. The revision aims to simplify
reporting obligations and significantly reduce the reporting burden for
companies.
At the same time, the European Commission
adopted the voluntary reporting standard for
small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) had
previously been revised as part of the first Omnibus package and entered into
force in its amended form on 18 March. As a result, the ESRS also had to be
aligned with the new requirements.
Mandate for EFRAG: Streamlining reporting requirements
The objective of the revision was to
substantially simplify the 2023
ESRS and reduce the reporting burden for companies. The European Financial
Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) had been mandated by the European Commission
to submit a technical proposal for the revision by the end of 2025. The process
was preceded by several stakeholder consultations between spring and autumn
2025. EFRAG’s work focused primarily on reducing the number of mandatory data
points. In addition, numerous voluntary data points were removed or converted
into non-binding implementation guidance to support companies in applying the
standards.
EFRAG proposal largely retained
The European Commission’s draft, published in
May, largely followed EFRAG’s recommendations. Compared with the original ESRS,
the number of mandatory data points was reduced by more than 60%, while the
total number of data points was cut by more than 70%. In addition, the European
Commission introduced a number of targeted amendments. According to the European
Commission, these are intended to clarify certain provisions and provide
companies with greater flexibility. For example, in line with the amendments to
the CSRD under the Omnibus I package, companies may omit certain information
under strict conditions where disclosure would seriously prejudice their
competitive position. Furthermore, a one-year transitional period was
introduced for companies using products containing substances of very high
concern (SVHCs).
Implementation challenges remain
However, the widely criticised reporting
requirements relating to occupational safety and health were not addressed.
Neither EFRAG’s proposals nor the European Commission’s amendments include any
substantial simplifications in this area. From the business community’s
perspective, these requirements neither produce meaningful nor comparable
information across the EU, while creating a disproportionate burden in terms of
data collection and reporting. The requirements concerning occupational
diseases continue to be regarded as particularly challenging.
With regard to reporting on occupational
diseases, the sole clarification introduced is that certain information only
has to be disclosed subject to legal restrictions. Whether this addition will
actually resolve the existing implementation challenges remains uncertain. In
some Member States, including Germany, companies are unable, or only able to a
limited extent, to collect the relevant data due to the design of national
systems and data protection requirements. Moreover, because occupational
diseases often have long latency periods, the related data are of limited value
in assessing a company's current sustainability performance.
Criticism from the business community
The revision of the ESRS has also attracted
criticism beyond the area of occupational safety and health. Companies and
their representative organisations question whether the deletions and
conceptual simplifications introduced will provide any meaningful relief for
reporting companies. They also point to continuing legal uncertainties, for
example regarding definitions, reporting obligations and assessment criteria.
Outlook
The delegated act revising the ESRS and the
delegated act establishing the voluntary reporting standard for SMEs were
submitted to the European Parliament and the Council for scrutiny at the
beginning of July. Both delegated acts will enter into force unless either the
European Parliament or the Council objects within the two-month scrutiny
period. This period may be extended once by a further two months. Whether the
revised standards will actually reduce the practical challenges associated with
reporting on occupational safety and health will only become clear once they
are applied in practice.